This week's Marketplace of Ideas, a conversation about the arrow of time
with theoretical physicist Sean Carroll, marks the program's 100th
interview. Despite that it doesn't quite translate to my having done exactly
100 interviews — some recordings never made the air, and I've
interviewed a bunch for other fora — ostensibly nice, round numbers
give me pause for reflection. What, after One Hundred Whole Interviews,
have I learned about one of my primary crafts?
The
lessons I can explain follow. I have no reason to believe they apply
only to those conducting weekly 55-minute-ish conversations on public
radio. You might well adapt them profitably to other journalistic
situations, documentary filmmaking (another interest of mine),
interviews of the to-get-a-real-job variety, or even regular old casual
interpersonal exchanges. In fact, the more alien the domain to which
you bring them, the happier I'll be. Go on, leave a comment about it.
Naturally, I could draw the exact opposite conclusions from all these by interview number 200, but here goes anyway:
Don't write questions. If conventional journalism has taught me anything — and it hasn't — it's to lead counterintuitive, so here's your counterintuition. I, as did every super-novice interviewer except maybe Michael Silverblatt, started out by scripting elaborate sheets of questions ahead of time. This is death. Work from a question sheet, and you kill any chance of organic exchange, of real, vital intellectual back-and-forth. You just tick off the boxes and grind awkwardly forth. Which leads me right into my next point, which should probably be a subpoint of this one...
Interviews are not conversations — conversations are objectively better. As Jack Paar told Dick Cavett, "Kid, don’t do interviews. That’s clipboards, and David Frost, and what’s your pet peeve and favorite movie. Make it a conversation." I once thought of this as a dichotomy between two equal and opposite hosting strategies. In the "facilitated speech," the host's goal is simply to elicit maximally interesting and detailed responses from the guest, minimizing their own presence. In the "conversation," the host both contributes and seeks contribution, potentially even mirroring the guest's role.
I
still regard those strategies as opposite, but they sure ain't equal.
Perhaps this is an undiplomatic claim to make, but conversations are
just better, always and absolutely, than formal,
traditionally-conceived interviews. Those strike me as nothing more
than hokey by-products of such journalistic rigidities as twitch time
limits and miniscule word counts. Planned, borderline-rehearsed
simulacra of conversations aren't conversations at all. They can't
wander into the unexpected, exciting places genuine conversations do,
nor can they hope to arrive at the the surprising, fascinating
conclusions genuine conversations do.
We know from everyday experience that doing conversation means sometimes leading, and sometimes being led. Hence the need, even in broadcast situations, to be prepared to...
Follow your guest. Because some broadcasters don't quite grok this, I'm forced to enshrine it as a separate point. This isn't to say that you should follow your guest all the time — certainly you'll want to show the way into promising intellectual territory now and then — but if he seems interested in and enthusiastic about discussing a certain subject, fall in line. It doesn't matter if you hadn't intended to talk about it. It doesn't matter if it doesn't keep with the interview's "theme." It doesn't matter if you don't know anything about it. (After all, you can learn from the guest, then and there.) Scrap your plan and follow.
Everything is interesting, properly approached, properly thought about, properly framed, properly discussed. I don't care if your guest wants to talk about their puppy. If they're that consumed with the puppy, there's something interesting about the puppy. It's not your job to steer him away from the puppy; it's your job to find the best angle from which to ask about the puppy, to...
Follow up. I don't remember where I first heard this, but it's become an old interviewer's saw: if a guest says, "And then I killed my entire family and buried them in the back yard," your next question should not be, "So where did you go to high school?" Ideally, everything you ask should flow smoothly from what the guest just said. I realize this isn't always easy; sometimes you've just got to jump the tracks. But if the subject has to change, far better to run with something your guest happened to bring up than to throw the switch yourself.
As elementary-school as this sounds, don't forget to ask your guest for real-world examples. I myself could use some improvement here; I've been complacent about letting abstractions and generalizations slide. It can feel a tad harsh to prod someone with the kind of responses that draw out examples — "Like what?", "Such as?" — and it's especially difficult for someone like me, who hates putting people on the spot, but the concrete provides much richer conversational material.
There's one follow-up technique I like very much, which I've come to call "The Old Distill-and-Expand." When a guest finishes answering a question, I sometimes try to summarize and clarify their answer back to them, asking if I've got it right. The trick to make this more interesting is to take this summary a step further, to extrapolate from it, to make a guess about its implications and see how the guest responds. This routinely gets me pretty compelling material.

Research indirectly by immersing yourself in the subject's world. Reading the guest's book, watching their movie or listening to their album is only step one. (And you'd be astonished how many interviewers don't reach step one.) Use other books, other movies, other music and the awesome power of the internet to get into and absorb the world around the subject, the culture they call home. Check out their other interviews. Look into their influences. Research people around the guest — geographically, intellectually, spiritually — as if you were going to interview them as well.
Only ask questions you're genuinely curious to hear answered. It so comes through when an interviewer asks a question for no better reason than that they assume it "should" be asked. If you don't actually care about the answer to a question, if you're not actually excited to know how the guest will respond, then for the love of YHWH, do not ask it.
(Were I given to dopier names, I would possibly have called this point "Curiosity, curiosity, curiosity," "Keep it curious" or "It's the curiosity, stupid!")
This speaks to a much greater divide that bears on every art form, every craft — probably every pursuit. Are you creating your work because you honestly find it cool, or because you're laboring under the notion that "people" will like it? This fumbly guesswork about the taste of some abstract audience has produced humanity's stupidest, least valuable art. Ditch the "people"-pleasing and make what you like.
The ideal question is askable of no one else, by no one else. And I emphasize the word ideal; most questions won't fit these criteria. While it's theoretically a trivial matter to ask your guest a question only he can answer — get into the specifics of his book, say, or an unusual event in his life — you'll find it's still done with shocking rarity, at least in the mainstream media. Pose a question that could be asked of anyone, "How did you get this idea?" being the most dishearteningly common, and you might as well wave a red flag signaling to the guest that he's in the hands of an idiot.
The "by no one else" part is more neglected, and thus more important. Though some will no doubt challenge me, I think it separates the great interviewers from the mediocre. Nearly every time I watch my favorite interviewers in action — your Roses, your Thorns, your Silverblatts — I think, "Man, only he would have asked that!" I sometimes even think, "Man, only he could have asked that!", which is truly nxtlvl.
Upshot: if you want to interview and you don't have a personality, get one. If you want to interview and you're unwilling to expose your personality, get over yourself. You'll ultimately find you have to...
Reveal your ignorance.
Hey, it beats the alternative. There's no shame in not knowing what
your guest is talking about; if you don't, chances are a lot of your
audience doesn't either. I rarely cringe so sourly as when I'm
listening to an interview and it becomes obvious that the host is
bluffing his was through something for which he neglected to prepare.
I'm not about non-preparation; by all means, prepare as much as
possible. But you can't know about everything in heaven and Earth.
Besides, you're in this game to develop, aren't you? Nothing impedes learning, improvement and evolution as much as pretending you already know, have fully improved and are perfectly evolved. Let's not even get into the embarrassment of realizing that you're a thousand steps up your wobbly Jenga tower of half-truths, guesses and elisions with no safe way down in sight.
Get to the human. And get past the boilerplate. The boilerplate is your enemy. If you're talking to a media veteran, someone who's been interviewed countless times before, they will have boilerplate. Behind this boilerplate is a fascinating human being, so you'll need to get around it or punch straight through it to produce so much as a reasonably interesting conversation. Your only tools are your questions.
The
most effective weapon is surprise. Some interviewers interpret this as
an endorsement of "gotcha" questions, but man, few things are more
tiresome than "gotcha" questions. (Need I invoke the wan spectacle of
Terry Gross going on the attack when presented with a guest too far
outside her own ideological realm?) I mean more the sort of surprise
one feels when presented with an entirely different way to think about
something familiar. It's the wonderful surprise produced by framing and
approach, not the deadening surprise produced by the j'accuse.
Whenever possible, interface with your guest as a human being, with all the complications that entails, rather than as a mere vehicle for ideas. The danger here, of course, is that you might lose sight of the value of ideas and turn into StoryCorps. The trick, to the extent that I've figured it out so far, is to conduct ideas-oriented conversations on a human level. And not, you know, to make Eastern Europeans weep in a bus.
You can't have a worthwhile conversation in seven minutes. If some suit insists you have to, take your skills elsewhere.

Naturally, I could draw the exact opposite conclusions from all these by interview number 200, but here goes anyway:
Don't write questions. If conventional journalism has taught me anything — and it hasn't — it's to lead counterintuitive, so here's your counterintuition. I, as did every super-novice interviewer except maybe Michael Silverblatt, started out by scripting elaborate sheets of questions ahead of time. This is death. Work from a question sheet, and you kill any chance of organic exchange, of real, vital intellectual back-and-forth. You just tick off the boxes and grind awkwardly forth. Which leads me right into my next point, which should probably be a subpoint of this one...
Interviews are not conversations — conversations are objectively better. As Jack Paar told Dick Cavett, "Kid, don’t do interviews. That’s clipboards, and David Frost, and what’s your pet peeve and favorite movie. Make it a conversation." I once thought of this as a dichotomy between two equal and opposite hosting strategies. In the "facilitated speech," the host's goal is simply to elicit maximally interesting and detailed responses from the guest, minimizing their own presence. In the "conversation," the host both contributes and seeks contribution, potentially even mirroring the guest's role.

We know from everyday experience that doing conversation means sometimes leading, and sometimes being led. Hence the need, even in broadcast situations, to be prepared to...
Follow your guest. Because some broadcasters don't quite grok this, I'm forced to enshrine it as a separate point. This isn't to say that you should follow your guest all the time — certainly you'll want to show the way into promising intellectual territory now and then — but if he seems interested in and enthusiastic about discussing a certain subject, fall in line. It doesn't matter if you hadn't intended to talk about it. It doesn't matter if it doesn't keep with the interview's "theme." It doesn't matter if you don't know anything about it. (After all, you can learn from the guest, then and there.) Scrap your plan and follow.
Everything is interesting, properly approached, properly thought about, properly framed, properly discussed. I don't care if your guest wants to talk about their puppy. If they're that consumed with the puppy, there's something interesting about the puppy. It's not your job to steer him away from the puppy; it's your job to find the best angle from which to ask about the puppy, to...
Follow up. I don't remember where I first heard this, but it's become an old interviewer's saw: if a guest says, "And then I killed my entire family and buried them in the back yard," your next question should not be, "So where did you go to high school?" Ideally, everything you ask should flow smoothly from what the guest just said. I realize this isn't always easy; sometimes you've just got to jump the tracks. But if the subject has to change, far better to run with something your guest happened to bring up than to throw the switch yourself.
As elementary-school as this sounds, don't forget to ask your guest for real-world examples. I myself could use some improvement here; I've been complacent about letting abstractions and generalizations slide. It can feel a tad harsh to prod someone with the kind of responses that draw out examples — "Like what?", "Such as?" — and it's especially difficult for someone like me, who hates putting people on the spot, but the concrete provides much richer conversational material.
There's one follow-up technique I like very much, which I've come to call "The Old Distill-and-Expand." When a guest finishes answering a question, I sometimes try to summarize and clarify their answer back to them, asking if I've got it right. The trick to make this more interesting is to take this summary a step further, to extrapolate from it, to make a guess about its implications and see how the guest responds. This routinely gets me pretty compelling material.

Research indirectly by immersing yourself in the subject's world. Reading the guest's book, watching their movie or listening to their album is only step one. (And you'd be astonished how many interviewers don't reach step one.) Use other books, other movies, other music and the awesome power of the internet to get into and absorb the world around the subject, the culture they call home. Check out their other interviews. Look into their influences. Research people around the guest — geographically, intellectually, spiritually — as if you were going to interview them as well.
Only ask questions you're genuinely curious to hear answered. It so comes through when an interviewer asks a question for no better reason than that they assume it "should" be asked. If you don't actually care about the answer to a question, if you're not actually excited to know how the guest will respond, then for the love of YHWH, do not ask it.
(Were I given to dopier names, I would possibly have called this point "Curiosity, curiosity, curiosity," "Keep it curious" or "It's the curiosity, stupid!")
This speaks to a much greater divide that bears on every art form, every craft — probably every pursuit. Are you creating your work because you honestly find it cool, or because you're laboring under the notion that "people" will like it? This fumbly guesswork about the taste of some abstract audience has produced humanity's stupidest, least valuable art. Ditch the "people"-pleasing and make what you like.
The ideal question is askable of no one else, by no one else. And I emphasize the word ideal; most questions won't fit these criteria. While it's theoretically a trivial matter to ask your guest a question only he can answer — get into the specifics of his book, say, or an unusual event in his life — you'll find it's still done with shocking rarity, at least in the mainstream media. Pose a question that could be asked of anyone, "How did you get this idea?" being the most dishearteningly common, and you might as well wave a red flag signaling to the guest that he's in the hands of an idiot.
The "by no one else" part is more neglected, and thus more important. Though some will no doubt challenge me, I think it separates the great interviewers from the mediocre. Nearly every time I watch my favorite interviewers in action — your Roses, your Thorns, your Silverblatts — I think, "Man, only he would have asked that!" I sometimes even think, "Man, only he could have asked that!", which is truly nxtlvl.
Upshot: if you want to interview and you don't have a personality, get one. If you want to interview and you're unwilling to expose your personality, get over yourself. You'll ultimately find you have to...

Besides, you're in this game to develop, aren't you? Nothing impedes learning, improvement and evolution as much as pretending you already know, have fully improved and are perfectly evolved. Let's not even get into the embarrassment of realizing that you're a thousand steps up your wobbly Jenga tower of half-truths, guesses and elisions with no safe way down in sight.
Get to the human. And get past the boilerplate. The boilerplate is your enemy. If you're talking to a media veteran, someone who's been interviewed countless times before, they will have boilerplate. Behind this boilerplate is a fascinating human being, so you'll need to get around it or punch straight through it to produce so much as a reasonably interesting conversation. Your only tools are your questions.

Whenever possible, interface with your guest as a human being, with all the complications that entails, rather than as a mere vehicle for ideas. The danger here, of course, is that you might lose sight of the value of ideas and turn into StoryCorps. The trick, to the extent that I've figured it out so far, is to conduct ideas-oriented conversations on a human level. And not, you know, to make Eastern Europeans weep in a bus.
You can't have a worthwhile conversation in seven minutes. If some suit insists you have to, take your skills elsewhere.
Really enjoyed this post, Colin.
Revealing my own ignorance, when you said "Nearly every time I watch my favorite interviewers in action — your Roses, your Thorns, your Silverblatts", I knew Rose but I am afraid not the other two. I found Silverblatt easily via Google and will give him a listen, but was unsuccessful in figuring out who Thorn is. First name, please?
Posted by: Justin Wehr | February 28, 2010 at 08:57 PM
@ Justin: Jesse Thorn (maximumfun.org / The Sound of Young America) I particularly liked his Ira Glass interview.
I don't like Rose very much (though i continue to watch him everyday for his guests), he interrupts his guests too much and answers his own questions! I would say he's the opposite of the Errol Morris school (shut up and listen). I suppose there is value in both approaches, I just wonder when one approach is better than another.
I also like Elvis Mitchell on The Treatment.
Also, the Mike Wallace archives are available on the University of Texas at Austin website
http://www.hrc.utexas.edu/collections/film/holdings/wallace/
Posted by: acc | March 01, 2010 at 01:09 PM
Thanks Colin!
Interesting take on Rose. I typically don't mind when he interrupts because I think it is usually well-timed, as in he knows exactly when the guest is about to repeat themselves. The thing I am most impressed by is how he always seems to get the best out of his guests -- he asks such difficult questions to which they always have such a smooth response. And what I most love about him (although often violating your "answerable by no one else" advice) is his big picture questions that get at the important points, and frequently surprise me.
I am in love with the Mike Wallace archives. The Ayn Rand interview is classic. Glad you pointed that out!
Posted by: Justin Wehr | March 01, 2010 at 08:31 PM
That wasn't actually me replying -- someone else got on it first! But I'm glad you got your question answered.
Posted by: Colin Marshall | March 01, 2010 at 09:34 PM
I've actually heard a really good 7 minute interview once and it surprised the hell out of me. It was one of the /film guys talking to Dave Gibbons at a watchman junket. It might have been the first time I heard anything interesting come out of a junket interview, actually.
All the same, great post, and keep up the great work on TMPOI.
Posted by: Neal | March 03, 2010 at 10:31 AM
This is a wonderful post! I also work in public radio and have learned over time not to cling to the tyranny of the "Question List" during interviews. When an interesting point is brought up by the guest, I'm perfectly happy to ditch the prepared questions and explore. (And if the new direction doesn't work out, you can always go back to your prepared questions if need be). I still always try to learn new and improved ways of interviewing, and your post Colin revealed some new techniques I look forward to trying out. Thanks!
Posted by: Stephen Williams | March 13, 2010 at 05:25 PM
Indeed, the best interviews I have had are the ones that turned into conversations. But that depends on both subjects being interesting and interested in the other. Many artists, when I get to them, are meeting me as journalist number 253 and are just tired of talking. Others don't like to be interviewed at all.
For the heavy hitters, i have a sheet ready to go with topics if my mind goes blank, or things I think make good topics that nobody else has asked. You've gotta study all their previous interviews, digest the bio, and also make sure they don't go off on fruitless tangents.
The best artists use interviews as a way of speaking through their own thought processes. (Brian Eno, as usual, comes to mind.) Some artists are rather guarded or bored with talking about craft. Edward Albee only got interested in talking about art. Tommy Lee Jones suddenly came alive talking about ranching. Rosanne Cash wanted to talk about her own combo of Christianity and Buddhism. Personal politics or issues are more important to certain celebrities than their latest work.
So, should you make an interview about this? On one hand, you get an excited subject. On the other, you risk boring your audience because they tuned in to hear Tommy Lee Jones talk about acting, not his ranch.
The other problem with the conversational approach is the risk of putting too much of oneself into the interview. When an artist talks about living in Japan, should I mention that I lived in Japan, like when I interview Sanford Biggers? Will that make him more open to talking? Does that make me sound egotistical? Does the audience care?
These are all good, difficult questions which I still struggle with every interview. But I try to get the line "that's a good question" every time, and feel like I earned it.
Posted by: Ted Mills | March 14, 2010 at 03:52 PM
This is excellent advice.
What do you say to press agents and information officers who request "a list of questions" before an interview?
Posted by: Alexis Hanawalt | March 14, 2010 at 05:12 PM
@alexis
You write out 10 anodyne questions and send them to the PR person.
Then you start the interview with question #11.
I teach people how to do interviews. Rule #1 is that you are doing the interview to tell a story, not to answer the interviewer's questions.
And full points to Colin for recommending that you learn about the interviewee and their background beforehand. Even a few minutes of research (especially if you can dig up one or two insightful/offbeat questions) can make the interviewee open up and make the interview far more interesting for the listener/viewer.
Posted by: Christopher Dillon | March 15, 2010 at 06:09 AM
These tips are great to have...definitely printing them now.
Posted by: Danae | April 19, 2010 at 05:06 PM
In a question, someone answered that if we were able to travel the speed of light, then we could somehow achieve time travel. How would this happen?
Also, how could we make time travel possible? Is there some formula to it? I think time travel is a really awesome concept, and I want to learn more about it.
Posted by: wireless sex toys | April 20, 2010 at 08:59 AM
I unfortunately know everything about leg cramps symptoms and, thanks,
don't need any more "what it is"....
I read about every article about coffee draining magnesium ressources,
tried the cold shower, the "magic pad" neutalizing the static
electricity, the "magnesium powder allcalm from Canada"
Posted by: places to have sex | April 21, 2010 at 02:44 PM
They were a clear plastic very rectangular frame (quite unique looking
I thought )with wide black plastic
arms. The height (or width) of the arms was the same as the height of
the frames.
Posted by: generic propecia | April 23, 2010 at 10:00 AM
I'mm 22, and love movies, but there are a lot of classic movies and other really popular movies that I haven't seen. I just signed up for Netflix and want to expand my movie repitoire. Any suggestions?
Posted by: generic cialis | April 26, 2010 at 08:54 AM
A nervousness of interviews is common, especially when an interview, and a resulting job, may have considerable effect on a person’s life. If an individual does not perform to their best of their ability during an interview, they may not `sell themselves` to the potential employer, and leave the interview feeling they could have performed better.
Posted by: interview techniques | June 02, 2010 at 06:16 AM
Thanks for all the great info! I'm still new to Twitter and this was so helpful! I was wondering how it works when you want to respond to something somebody said.
Posted by: costa rica investments | July 28, 2010 at 01:36 PM
Thanks for the article. Conducting an interview can be very difficult. These tips can really help.
Posted by: Job Search Tips | August 10, 2010 at 05:28 PM
Hello. Yesterday I was referring to large number of blog about this subject. Nice great content your blog, very useful for the work I do. Let me thank the comments of others who participate in this blog because it serves to instruct better about it. Great job and again thank you very much excellent info. beautiful!! I'm usually more of a modern, minimalist person, but these are so quaint and cute.
Posted by: viagra online | August 20, 2010 at 08:56 AM
wow all those garments are so amazing and fabulous I don't come to your blog as often as I would like, but whenever I do I see some really amazing things keep up the good work! =)
Posted by: Christmas gift | August 21, 2010 at 02:52 AM
I just came across this and loved your idea of focusing on a different aspect for each day of the week! Thank you so much for sharing this and allowing us to copy it as well! I think this will be a lovely addition to our morning prayer time as well!
Posted by: Angel men perfume | September 13, 2010 at 09:55 PM
hi colin
great post. thanks for the great advice. keep posting informative info and your audience will grow with you.
Posted by: Electrician Brisbane | September 14, 2010 at 05:34 PM
Hello!!
I really appreciate this wonderful post that you have provided for us.
I assure this would be beneficial for most of the people.
Posted by: Generic Viagra | September 17, 2010 at 06:53 PM
Not only good but awesome post ;)
Posted by: Garage Kits | September 21, 2010 at 11:47 AM
Thanks for awesome post Colin!
Posted by: Droid X case | September 22, 2010 at 02:56 PM
Hello. Yesterday I was referring to large number of blog about this subject. Nice great content your blog, very useful for the work I do. Let me thank the comments of others who participate in this blog because it serves to instruct better about it.
Posted by: buy jeans | October 13, 2010 at 07:03 AM
Cody -- this tip here: "Reveal your ignorance. Hey, it beats the alternative. There's no shame in not knowing what your guest is talking about" is incredibly valuable. So many times you here the interviewer act like they know more about the topic and they do, and it ruins the entire dialogue.
Posted by: Garage Kits | October 28, 2010 at 12:36 PM
Yesterday I was referring to large number of blog about this subject. Nice great content your blog, very useful for the work I do. Let me thank the comments of others who participate in this blog because it serves to instruct better about it. Great job and again thank you very much excellent info.
Posted by: cheap cigarettes | November 09, 2010 at 05:19 AM
I read through the report and it was a great source of information. Thanks for providing the great read!
http://www.dealsourcedirect.com/audio-turntables.html
Posted by: Account Deleted | November 26, 2010 at 06:47 AM
I agree with you . Now all became clear, I thank for the help and I hope to see more such articles.
Posted by: christian louboutin | December 12, 2010 at 05:29 PM
The type of exercise you do all depends on you and what you like to do. What you hate doing, paying membership fees, and whether or not to buy equipment are all things you need to consider as well as answer.
Posted by: Generic Viagra | December 28, 2010 at 11:14 PM
Hi there,
you have done really nice job. There are many people searching about that now they will find enough sources by your tips.
looking forward for more tips about that
Posted by: Generic Cialis | January 07, 2011 at 11:05 PM
You have talked about issued that are debatable in a very subtle manner and informative way…good. How did you manage to do this is a big question. You have inspired me to work harder now.
Posted by: Generic Viagra | January 17, 2011 at 09:49 PM
I still always try to learn new and improved ways of interviewing, and your post Colin revealed some new techniques I look forward to trying out. Thanks!
Posted by: Health Blog | January 21, 2011 at 06:06 AM
Hey really it's very interesting stuff found here.... Keep posting such an interesting information, I'm looking forward to your new posts.
Posted by: Health Blog | January 26, 2011 at 06:03 AM
hey buddy,this is one of the best posts that I’ve ever seen; you may include some more ideas in the same theme. I’m still waiting for some interesting thoughts from your side in your next post.
Posted by: Generic Viagra | February 10, 2011 at 02:22 AM
Tässä on would not harm small businesses. Their response shows the lack of understanding that they have of the cosmetic industry, ingredients and science in general.
Posted by: Cheap Chanel Bags | February 16, 2011 at 06:06 PM
I really agree with the facts that you have shared on this post. An interesting topic like this really enhances reader's mind to have more effective decisions over a certain issue.
Posted by: Mc Arthur | February 17, 2011 at 05:14 PM
Really you have done great job,
Posted by: Astrology Readings | February 20, 2011 at 10:28 PM
What an idea,
Great tips, I would like to join your blog anyway,
Posted by: ベネトリン | March 01, 2011 at 03:54 AM
Hola,
Ha hecho un trabajo muy bueno. Hay muchas personas en busca de eso ahora van a encontrar suficientes fuentes por tus consejos.espera para obtener más consejos acerca de que
Posted by: generic Cymbalta | March 01, 2011 at 05:30 AM
It’s a nice post!Thanks for your good work,it helps me a lot!I will come back again!sting comments. I found this post while searching the web for some random stuff. Thanks
Posted by: angina pectoris | March 03, 2011 at 12:18 AM
Really great post, Thank you for sharing This knowledge.
Excellently written article, if only all bloggers offered the same level of content as you, the internet would be a much better place. Please keep it up!
Posted by: tadacip | March 04, 2011 at 10:02 PM
I would like to consider the opportunity of saying thanks to you for your professional instruction I have always enjoyed visiting your site. We are looking forward to the commencement of my college research and the overall planning would never have been complete without browsing your web blog. If I can be of any help to others, I'd personally be delighted to help by means of what I have gained from here.
Posted by: mariage | March 10, 2011 at 02:26 PM
It’s a nice post!Thanks for your good work,it helps me a lot!I will come back again!sting comments. I found this post while searching the web for some random stuff. Thanks
Posted by: orjin krem | March 19, 2011 at 10:31 AM
The type of exercise you do all depends on you and what you like to do. What you hate doing, paying membership fees, and whether or not to buy equipment are all things you need to consider as well as answer.
Posted by: Alex | March 27, 2011 at 12:55 PM
There are may person searching about that now they will find enough resources by your post,
Posted by: Seo Services India | April 05, 2011 at 06:15 AM
Vänligen en mer inlägg om det .. jag behöver den här artikeln för att slutföra mitt uppdrag i kollegiet, och den har samma tema med din artikel. Tack, bra aktie.@@
Posted by: Generic Viagra | April 18, 2011 at 03:51 AM
You raise a lot of questions in my head; you wrote an excellent post, but this post is also mind provoking, and I will have to think about it a bit more; I will return soon.
Posted by: Shop Design Brisbane | May 02, 2011 at 08:32 PM
nice work as always. O'Reilly is a dick with a clear agenda. He seems to think that as long as he admits that he's an "opinion" guy and not a regular news anchor that somehow negates his responsibility to tell the truth. He, of curse, is wrong.
Posted by: Wilmayxi042 | May 04, 2011 at 04:14 AM
This is a really very articulate opinion. Not every visitor would look at it from that angle, the way you just did. I am glad that there is so much information about this subject that have been uncovered and you did it so well, with true class. If wanted to know more about e cigarette, than by all means come in and check our stuff.
Posted by: new era hats | May 04, 2011 at 08:10 PM
Gracias, share.I gran necesidad de este artículo para completar mi tarea en el colegio, y tiene un mismo tema con su artículo.!!!!
Posted by: Generic Viagra | May 07, 2011 at 05:27 AM
But wait, how about the program? Are you positive it will fit the requirements of your house?
Posted by: Ed Hardy Discount Clothing | May 08, 2011 at 05:45 PM
The blog is very complete and very helpful the pictures you used to understand, really amused me much, if I really like your blog!
Posted by: Buy penegra online | May 10, 2011 at 02:09 AM
I really like a more conversational style. I don't want to listen to an interview where it seems like the person is applying for a job. I like an interview where it seems like I'm eavesdropping on a really interesting conversation.
Posted by: Timeshare Donation To Charity | May 11, 2011 at 08:15 AM
It's a serious job to do. A great profession that requires experience.
Posted by: oakland dui lawyer | May 17, 2011 at 07:39 AM
There are may person searching about that now they will find enough resources by your post.Good Luck
Posted by: Dating reviews | May 18, 2011 at 05:06 AM
good to see you again...It’s hard to find knowledgeable people on this topic, but you sound like you know what you’re talking about! Thanks
Posted by: Testking 70-647 | May 18, 2011 at 05:20 AM
A good blog! When an artist talks about living in Japan, should I mention that I lived in Japan, like when I interview Sanford Biggers? Will that make him more open to talking? Does that make me sound egotistical? Does the audience care?
Posted by: russian ladies dating | May 22, 2011 at 12:47 AM
I actually like what you could have acquired here, really like what that you are saying and exactly how in which you say it. You are making it enjoyable therefore you still care for to hold it smart.
Posted by: logo design | May 23, 2011 at 05:41 AM
Thanks for sharing the idea there would be some apprehensions from segment but i am up for it.
edicion imagen
Posted by: edicion imagen | May 25, 2011 at 01:57 AM
I really like a more conversational style. I don't want to listen to an interview where it seems like the person is applying for a job. I like an interview where it seems like I'm eavesdropping on a really interesting conversation.
Posted by: chrisitian louboutin | May 26, 2011 at 02:15 AM
Thanks for sharing..Interesting subject and well written..hope to be back soon and see more stuff
Posted by: acheter cialis | June 13, 2011 at 05:38 AM
i really like this post
Posted by: Best Wishes Sms | June 14, 2011 at 10:40 PM
Im really glad to see an advancement in the google ad development. I have been trying for years to learn more and more. It never seems to amaze me how google keeps improving it's software. Thanks for the share.
Posted by: African Mango Reviews | June 22, 2011 at 09:16 PM
I have wanted to learn more about particular topics, but not many websites would help me out in informing me the way I expected. This left me with many question, but after reading your article, I got an answer to all my questions. You are too cool dude!!!
Posted by: Generic Drugs Exporter | June 30, 2011 at 05:27 AM
Mi dispiace
Posted by: カード現金化 | June 30, 2011 at 08:22 PM
This impressive information like each reader. Thank you!
Posted by: Comprar Sildenafil sin receta | July 06, 2011 at 12:44 AM
Thanks for shareing! I agree with you. The artical improve me so much! I will come here frequently.
Posted by: tava tea reviews | July 06, 2011 at 02:23 AM
I got more information about that stuff. thanks for sharing this post .
Posted by: Flats to rent in croydon | July 07, 2011 at 10:26 PM
Really you have done great job.i like it
Posted by: e-conomic integration | July 07, 2011 at 11:53 PM
Thanks for sharing i got more idea from your post..
Posted by: CRM udvikling | July 08, 2011 at 12:09 AM
thanks very much for your post, it is indeed wonderful to read your article,I like it very much.
Posted by: Acid Stain Decorative Concrete | July 10, 2011 at 11:16 PM
ehi amico, questo è uno dei migliori post che io abbia mai visto, si possono comprendere le idee ancora un po 'nel tema stesso. Sto ancora aspettando alcune interessanti riflessioni da parte vostra nel prossimo post.
Posted by: Hair Loss | July 10, 2011 at 11:39 PM
It was very interesting to read.
serve as a reference
Posted by: creditcard genkinka | July 12, 2011 at 11:30 PM
Excellent site, keep up the good work my colleagues would love this.
Posted by: shopping genkinka | July 22, 2011 at 11:07 PM
Hello
Posted by: bank | July 25, 2011 at 08:02 AM
thnk you for sharing
Posted by: escort | July 26, 2011 at 05:42 PM
The post is pretty interesting. I really never thought I could have a good read by this time until I found out this site. I am grateful for the information given. Thank you for being so generous enough to have shared your knowledge with us Round Rock Condo
Posted by: luck | July 29, 2011 at 08:12 PM
Great written article will be waiting for your future posts.
Thank you for sharing
Posted by: horoscoperemedies | July 31, 2011 at 06:26 PM
I think this a good blog post,thanks for sharing.
Posted by: Best Indian Astrologer | July 31, 2011 at 06:44 PM
Thank You a ton for writing such a wonderful piece of information. Keep sharing such ideas in the future as well. This was actually what I was looking for, and I am glad to came here! Thanks for sharing the such information with us.
Posted by: viagra | August 03, 2011 at 11:47 AM
This article is exactly what I needed, thank you for sharing. I would recommend friends over to read. I hope you can keep writing more and more good articles. This is really useful to me.
Posted by: cheap hats | August 03, 2011 at 05:09 PM
This is one of the fabulous old article I found today.
I really find a great interest in it.
Posted by: it optimering | August 04, 2011 at 01:17 AM
I liked it very much.Your post is really informative for me.
Posted by: CRM til google apps | August 04, 2011 at 03:06 AM
Nice information, many thanks to the author.I agree with your thought.Thank you for your sharing.
Posted by: Family Lawyer Brampton | August 05, 2011 at 01:37 AM
tHIS IS REALLY VERY INSPIRING "The lessons I can explain follow. I have no reason to believe they apply only to those conducting weekly 55-minute-ish conversations on public radio. You might well adapt them profitably to other journalistic situations. I wish to hear more from you.
Posted by: Tenant Background Check | August 08, 2011 at 03:46 AM
I like this information most "This speaks to a much greater divide that bears on every art form, every craft — probably every pursuit. Are you creating your work because you honestly find it cool, or because you're laboring under the notion that "people" will like it? Keep it up.
Posted by: Bankrupcy Attorney | August 08, 2011 at 03:47 AM
Exchange of information agree that you are really great. Again thank you good luck.
Posted by: Kanarya Güvercin | August 15, 2011 at 03:35 AM
Sharing a nice thank you admin.
Posted by: Escort Bayanlar | August 15, 2011 at 03:37 AM
Good blog!
Thanks for sharing!Lago Vista Real Estate
Posted by: Account Deleted | August 15, 2011 at 01:04 PM
Your post is rocking and knowledgeable… I really appreciate the way you write . I would like to read more from you.
Posted by: plndr coupon code | August 18, 2011 at 12:42 PM
I was interested know about it.
Posted by: Account Deleted | August 20, 2011 at 01:22 AM
I was interested know about it lesbian bondage
Posted by: leon | August 22, 2011 at 02:05 AM
Really very interesting information.... Thanks very much for sharing it. Keep posting such interesting information.
Posted by: ipad 3 | August 22, 2011 at 02:56 AM
The blog is to good and informative.
Posted by: gucci belt | August 23, 2011 at 12:50 AM
Rather actually! I still always try to learn new and improved ways of interviewing, and your post Colin revealed some new techniques I look forward to trying out.
Posted by: Camarad | August 23, 2011 at 01:30 AM
If you need more traffic to your website check out the website in my name. It really helped me and i think it can help your website.
Posted by: buy vicodin online | August 23, 2011 at 12:52 PM
I really agree with the facts that you have shared on this post. An interesting topic like this really enhances reader's mind to have more effective decisions over a certain issue.
Posted by: water bondage sex | August 25, 2011 at 12:07 AM
Fascinating and well recorded. I seem to remember reading, some years ago, about a mosquito, in SE Asia I think, of the genus Harpagomyia that does something similar, only it actually inserts its proboscis into the ant's crop, again the ant is a Crematogaster species. It would be nice to know of other occurences of flies, or other insects taking advantage of ants in this sort of way, or to know if other genera of ants are similarly effected
Posted by: müzik dinle | August 30, 2011 at 12:23 AM
great post thanks a lot.
Posted by: borsaforumu | September 01, 2011 at 09:13 AM