Detroit, Michigan's Craigslist apartment-listings page is just...
insanity. Look at it. A one-bedroom for $450? A two-bedroom for $525? A
three-bed, three-bath house for $1300?
By comparison, here's the Santa Barbara page:

So,
a "spacious studio" for $975. If you're quick enough to snag it. And
yes, location, location, location: Santa Barbara is a clean, prosperous
beachside community, whereas Detroit has become a byword for "burnt-out
urban hellhole." But still, such numbers make me wonder. One grinds
through quite a lot of inconsequential bullshit to make rent in a town
where a reasonably-located one-bedroom might easily run you $1500. What
if I was paying only $450 for rent? Or if I split that? Imagine the
work — the
real work, not the fake stuff — on which I could
concentrate. Media is more or less my thang, and Detroit's no media
capital, but it's not as if I'd stay there forever.

But,
ah, the crime, the decay, the roving gangs of dispossessed auto
workers: all valid concerns, and not ones I could pretend to explain
away. (Let's not even get into the weather, which forces me consider
that whole side of North America effectively uninhabitable.) The fact
of the matter is that I've long held the desire to live in a "bad"
place, to better balance out the yin and the yang of life,
etc.
(This active seeking of unpleasantness is different from masochism, for
reasons which will come to me.) Bad isn't bad, but nor is it good; it
just...
is, providing much-needed contrast. I suppose I could
simply move to some non-Park Slope part of Brooklyn and wallow in
garbage for a while, but that's not particularly enterprising.
I think a lot about
(a) the nature of cities,
(b) doing bold, unusual "stunts" as a way to live life to its fullest,
(c) deliberately time-limiting what I enter into and
(d)
my ultimate goal of telling geography to take its strictures and shove
them. Suddenly pulling stakes up from S.B., driving them into the rich,
steel shaving-filled Detroit soil and remaining there for like a year
or two would definitely tie those threads together. Not that my chance
of actually doing so exceeds, oh, one percent — if that — but it
remains a fun thought experiment.

Alas,
the fact stands that I haven't yet built up enough fame and/or
location-independent viability to move wherever I please, just 'cause.
(Or am I only telling myself that, as an excuse not to pack boxes?) But
when I do, I'll keep an eye out for the kind of city that's just
overlooked, damaged or depressed enough to become a subcultural hotbed
of the next decade. With sufficient craft, you can make a tasty meal
from dented, discounted cans; by the same token, you can found
aesthetic, intellectual and cultural movements in places where they
nearly pay
you to rent housing.

Detroit's current nowhere-to-go-but-up ethos — city motto: "
Speramus Meliora; Resurget Cineribus"
— appeals to me on this level. I was talking to a fellow journalist
just last weekend, a Detroit native who came to Southern California in
the mid-2000s, about the long-running will-it-or-won't-it conversation
re: his hometown's potential revival. He didn't seem sorry to have
traded the negative aspects of Detroit for those of Santa Barbara. But
then, what I don't appreciate about S.B. now, I would
certainly
appreciate after a stint in a place like Detroit. Kinda like how, after
seven years in S.B., I can actually muster enthusiasm for the very sort
of stuff from which a Detroiter seeks flight.
(But as long as Los Angeles' Koreatown still offers sub-$1000 one-bedrooms, Motor City's gonna have to wait.)